Eros und Evolution

T., Dale, S. und Lampe, H., 1992, »Femalefemale Aggression Explains Polyterritoriality in Male Pied Flycatchers‹, Animal Behaviour, 43, S. 397-407.
    Slater, P. J. B., 1983, ›The Buzby Phenomenon: Thrushes and Telephones«, Animal Behaviour, 31, S. 308-309.
    Small, M. F., 1992, »What’s Love Got to Do with It?‹, Discover Magazine, 13, S. 46-51.
    - und Hrdy, S. B., 1986, ›Secondary Sex Ratios by Maternal Rank, Parity and Age in Captive Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) ‹ , American Journal of Primatology, II, S. 359-365.
    Smith, R. L., 1984, ›Human Sperm Competitions Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, Hrsg.: R. L. Smith, Academic Press, Orlando, S. 601-659.
    Smuts, R. W., 1993, ›Fat, Sex, Class, Adaptive Flexibility and Cultural Change‹, Ethology and Sociobiology (im Druck).
    Spandrel, S., (nicht veröffentlicht), ›How the Genome Learnt Mendelian Genetics, or You Scratch My Back, I’ll Stab Yours‹.
    Spurrier, M. F., Boyce, M. S. und Manly, B. F. J., 1991, ›Effects of Parasites on Mate Choice by Captive Sage Grouse‹, Ecology, Behavior and Evolution of Bird-Parasite Interactions, Hrsg.: J. E. Loye und M. Zuk, Oxford University Press, Oxford, S. 389-398.
    Stearns, S.C., Hrsg., 1987, The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences, Birkhäuser, Basel.
    Stebbins, C. L, 1950, Variation and Evolution in Plants, Columbia University Press, New York.
    Symington, M. M., 1987, ›Sex-ratio and Maternal Rank in Wild Spider Monkeys: When Daughters Disperses Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20, S. 421-425.
    Symons, D., 1979, The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    1987, ›An Evolutionary Approach: Can Darwin’s View of Life Shed Light on Human Sexuality?‹, Theories of Human Sexuality, Hrsg.: J. H. Geer und W. O’Donohue, Plenum Press, New York, S. 91-125.
    1989, ›The Psychology of Human Mate Preferences‹, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, S. 34-35.
    1992, ›On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behaviors The Adapted Mind, Hrsg.: J.H. Barkow, L Cosmides und J. Tooby, Oxford University Press, New York, S. 137-159.
    Tannen, D., 1990, You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, William Morrow, New York (deutsche Ausgabe: Du kannst mich einfach nicht verstehen, Warum Männer und Frauen aneinander vorbeireden, Hamburg 1991).
    Taylor, P.D. und Williams, G.C., 1982, ›The Lek Paradox is not Resolveds Theoretical Population Biology, 22, S. 392-409.
    Thornhill, N. W., 1989a, ›Characteristics of Female Desirability: Facultative Standards of Beauty‹, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, S. 35-36.
    1989b, ›The Evolutionary Significance of Incest Rules‹, Ethology and Sociobiology, II, S. 113-129.
    1990, ›The Comparative Method of Evolutionary Biology in the Study of the Societies of History‹. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 27, S.7-27.
    Thornhill, R. und Thornhill, N.W., 1983, ›Human Rape: An Evolutionary Analysiss Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, S. 137-183.und Sauer, R, 1992, ›Genetic Sire Effects on the Fighting Ability of Sons and Daughters and Mating Success of Sons in and Scorpionfly‹, Animal Behaviour, 43, S. 255-264. und Thornhill, N. W., 1989, ›The Evolution of Psychological Pain‹, Sociobiology and Social Sciences, Hrsg.: R. J. Bell und N. J. Bell, Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, S. 73-103.
    Thorpe, W. H., 1954, ›The Process of Song-learning in the Chaffinch as Studied by Means of the Sound Spectrograph‹, Nature, 173, S. 465-469.
    - 1961, Bird Song: The Biology of Vocal Communication in Birds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Tiersch, E.R., Beck, M.L. und Douglas, M., 1991, ›ZZW Autotriploidy in a Blue and Yellow Macaw‹, Genetica, 84, S. 209-212.
    Tiger, L., 1991, ›Human Nature and the Psycho-industrial Complex‹, Man and Beast Revisited, Hrsg.: M. H. Robinson und L. Tiger, Smithsonian, Washington, DC, S. 23-40.
    - und Shepher, J., 1977, Women in the Kibbutz, Penguin, London.
    Tooby, J., 1982, ›Pathogens, Polymorphism and the Evolution of Sex‹, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 97, S. 557-576.und Cosmides, L. M., 1989, ›The Innate Versus the Manifest: How Universal Does a Universal Have to Be?‹, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, S.36-37. und Cosmides, L. M., 1990, ›On the Universality of Human Nature and the Uniqueness of the Individual: The Role of Genetics and Adaptation«, Journal of Personality, 58, S. 17-67. und Cosmides,