Science of Discworld III

the edge of the Milky Way while singing Monteverdi. It would be lovely if that meant it had to exist, but at some point a reality check is in order.
    We don’t want to leave you with the impression that we enjoy pouring cold water over every imaginative attempt to convey a feeling for some of the remarkable concepts of modern cosmology and physics. So we’ll end with a very recent addition to the stable of parallel worlds, which has quite a few things going for it. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the main thing not currently going for it is a shred of experimental evidence.
    The new theory on the block is string theory. It provides a philosophically sensible answer to the age-old question: why are we here? And it does so by invoking gigantic numbers of parallel universes.
    It is just much more careful how it handles them.
    Our source is an article, ‘The String Theory Landscape’ by Raphael Bousso and Joseph Polchinski, in the September 2004 issue of Scientific American – a special issue on the theme of Albert Einstein.
    If there is a single problem that occupies the core of modern physics, it is that of unifying quantum mechanics with relativity. This search for a ‘theory of everything’ is needed because although both of those theories are extraordinarily successful in helping us to understand and predict various aspects of the natural world, they are not totally consistent with each other. Finding a consistent, unified theory is hard, and we don’t yet have one. But there’s one mathematically attractive attempt, string theory, which is conceptually appealing even though there’s no observational evidence for it.
    String theory holds that what we usually consider to be individual points of spacetime, dimensionless dots with no interesting structure of their own, are actually very, very tiny multidimensional surfaces with complicated shapes. The standard analogy is a garden hose. Seen from some way off, a hose looks like a line, which is a one-dimensional space – the dimension being distance along the hose. Look more closely, though, and you see that the hose has two extra dimensions, at right angles to that line, and that its shape in those directions is a circular band.
    Maybe our own universe is a bit like that hosepipe. Unless we look very closely, all we see is three dimensions of space plus one of time – relativity. An awful lot of physics is observed in those dimensions alone, so phenomena of that type have a nice four-dimensional description – relativity again. But other things might happen along extra ‘hidden’ dimensions, like the thickness of the hose. For instance, suppose that at each point of the apparent four-dimensional spacetime, what seems to be a point is actually a tiny circle, sticking out at right angles to spacetime itself. That circle could vibrate. If so, then it would resemble the quantum description of a particle. Particles have various ‘quantum numbers’ such as spin. These numbers occur as whole number multiples of some basic amount. So do vibrations of a circle: either one wave fits into the circle, or two, or three … but not two and a quarter, say.
    This is why it’s called ‘string theory’. Each point of spacetime is replaced by a tiny loop of string.
    In order to reconstruct something that agrees with quantum theory, however, we can’t actually use a circular string. There are too many distinct quantum numbers, and plenty of other problems that have to be overcome. The suggestion is that instead of a circle, we have to use a more complicated, higher-dimensional shape, known as a ‘brane’. 9 Think of this as a surface, only more so. There are manydistinct topological types of surface: a sphere, a doughnut, two doughnuts joined together, three doughnuts … and in more dimensions than two, there are more exotic possibilities.
    Particles correspond to tiny closed strings that loop around the brane. There are lots of different ways to loop a string round a doughnut – once through the hole, twice, three times … The physical laws depend on the shape of the brane and the paths followed by these loops.
    The current favourite brane has six dimensions, making ten in all. The extra dimensions are thought to be curled up very tightly, smaller than the Planck length, which is the size at which the universe becomes grainy. It is virtually impossible to observe anything that small, because the graininess blurs everything and the fine detail cannot be seen. So