The Reversal

people.”
    “That is a lot, Dr. Eisenbach. Do you remember them all?”
    “Of course not. I remember a handful off the top of my head. The rest of them I would need my notes to remember.”
    After receiving permission from the judge I approached the witness stand and put down a forty-page document.
    “I draw your attention to the document I have placed before you. Can you identify it?”
    “Yes, it’s an autopsy protocol dated February eighteenth, nineteen eighty-six. The deceased is listed as Melissa Theresa Landy. My name is also on it. It is one of mine.”
    “Meaning you conducted the autopsy?”
    “Yes, that is what I said.”
    I followed this with a series of questions that established the autopsy procedures and the general health of the victim prior to death. Royce objected several times to what he termed leading questions. Few of these were sustained by the judge but that was not the point. Royce had adopted the tactic of attempting to get me out of rhythm by incessantly interrupting, whether such interruptions were valid or not.
    Working around these interruptions, Eisenbach was able to testify that Melissa Landy was in perfect health until the moment of her violent death. He said she had not been sexually attacked in any determinable way. He said there was no indication of prior sexual activity—she was a virgin. He said the cause of her death was asphyxiation. He said the evidence of crushed bones in her neck and throat indicated she had been choked by a powerful force—a man’s single hand.
    Using a laser pointer to mark locations on photographs of the body taken at autopsy, Eisenbach identified a bruise pattern on the victim’s neck that was indicative of a one-handed choke hold. With the laser point he delineated a thumb mark on the right side of the girl’s neck and the larger, four-finger mark on the left side.
    “Doctor, did you make a determination of which hand the killer used to choke the victim to death?”
    “Yes, it was quite simple to determine the killer had used the right hand to choke this girl to death.”
    “Just one hand?”
    “That is correct.”
    “Was there any determination of how this was done? Had the girl been suspended while she was choked?”
    “No, the injuries, particularly the crushed bones, indicated that the killer put his hand on her neck and pressed her against a surface that offered resistance.”
    “Could that have been the seat of a vehicle?”
    “Yes.”
    “How about a man’s leg?”
    Royce objected, saying the question called for pure speculation. The judge agreed and told me to move on.
    “Doctor, you mentioned twenty thousand autopsies. I assume that many of these were homicides involving asphyxiation. Was it unusual to come across a case where only one hand was used to choke a victim to death?”
    Royce objected again, this time saying the question asked for an answer outside the witness’s expertise. But the judge went my way.
    “The man has conducted twenty thousand autopsies,” she said. “I’m inclined to think that gives him a lot of expertise. I’m going to allow the question.”
    “You can answer, Doctor,” I said. “Was this unusual?”
    “Not necessarily. Many homicides occur during struggles and other circumstances. I’ve seen it before. If one hand is otherwise occupied, the other must suffice. We are talking about a twelve-year-old girl who weighed ninety-one pounds. She could have been subdued with one hand if the killer needed the left hand for something else.”
    “Would driving a vehicle fall into that category?”
    “Objection,” Royce said. “Same argument.”
    “And same ruling,” Breitman said. “You may answer, Doctor.”
    “Yes,” Eisenbach said. “If one hand was being used to maintain control of a vehicle the other hand could be used to choke the victim. That is one possibility.”
    At this point I believed I had gotten all that there was to get from Eisenbach. I ended direct examination and handed the witness over to Royce. Unfortunately for me, Eisenbach was a witness who had something for everybody. And Royce went after it.
    “ ‘One possibility,’ is that what you called it, Dr. Eisenbach?”
    “Excuse me?”
    “You said the scenario Mr. Haller described—one hand on the wheel, one hand on the neck—was one possibility. Is that correct?”
    “Yes, that is a possibility.”
    “But you weren’t there, so you can’t know for sure. Isn’t that right, Doctor?”
    “Yes, that is