Bücher online kostenlos Kostenlos Online Lesen
The Sookie Stackhouse Companion

The Sookie Stackhouse Companion

Titel: The Sookie Stackhouse Companion Kostenlos Bücher Online Lesen
Autoren: Charlaine Harris
Vom Netzwerk:
to marry him in the end of the second season when it was so far from the books? Was it that it was a good way to have Bill kidnapped/disappear?
    —ADDIE BROWN
     
    I think the motivation was to give them a moment of happiness, a hope that something they thought was off-limits to both of them was actually within their grasp. They’ve been through so much together during their relatively short relationship, it felt nice to give them a moment of “normalcy” and the hope that they could have a happy ending. Of course, this being True Blood , there isn’t much chance of that.
     
     
    What inspired you to make the Sookie books into an HBO series?
    —KIM MCCOLLOM
     
    I was so deeply entertained by the experience of reading the books, I just thought it would make a great TV show. The world and the characters seemed too large for just a movie—to me, it begged for the larger canvas of a TV series.
     
     
    Your show has resonated with such a wide demographic group of people—many not typical fans of vampires and the paranormal. What [do you think] sets True Blood apart from all the other vampire movies/ shows to attract such a following?
    —KIM MCCOLLOM
     
    I think it’s because of several different elements: the characters and the world that Charlaine created; the performances by the amazingly talented cast; the humor, the romance, the scares; the focus we try to keep on making everything, no matter how outlandish, grounded in the emotional lives of the characters. It’s just a really fun show to make and hopefully a fun show to watch.
     
     
    What were your first impressions of the people in Bon Temps?
    —NADEEN CUMMINGS
     
    They felt really authentic to me. I grew up in a semismall town in the South (Marietta, Georgia), and the descriptions of the characters, the way they behaved and spoke, it all felt like something I recognized.
     
     
    I love the character of Lafayette and am so glad that he survived Season 1 of True Blood , unlike his less-fortunate counterpart in the books. Did you decide that his character would go beyond Season 1 from the beginning, or was that decision made after seeing how well he came to life on screen?
    —LAURA CHEQUER
     
    The first scene I shot with Nelsan Ellis in the pilot made it abundantly clear to me that this was a character we could never lose. I am usually not a fan of actors who improvise, but Nelsan doesn’t just improvise, he channels from planet Lafayette. In a lesser actor’s hands, Lafayette could come across as extreme or one-dimensional; Nelsan makes him strong, fierce, and deeply lovable.
     
     
    Will you consider casting yourself in a cameo role each season (à la Alfred Hitchcock)?
    —TEDDI SMITH
     
    Never! I allowed myself to be talked into doing that in an episode of Six Feet Under and have always regretted it. I think it would just take viewers out of the story.
     
     
    Many changes have been made from Charlaine Harris’s books to the show, and I’m wondering why you chose to paint Bill and Sophie-Anne in the light you did, as opposed to the way Ms. Harris wrote the characters? While there are a lot of similarities in Bill, it seems your Sophie-Anne is very modern and not the regal, aristocratic French queen portrayed in the series. Any insight to your decisions would be appreciated.
    —SUSAN MOSS
     
    In True Blood , Sophie-Anne appears in the same season Godric appears. We chose not to have two ancient vampires who seem barely older than children in the same season. And ultimately, every nonregular character on our show exists to create conflicts and challenges for our regular characters. Having read all the books at this point, and knowing why Bill appeared in Bon Temps in the first place, we chose to play Sophie-Anne a little differently. We also were setting up a major story line in Season 3.
     
     
    In the show, it consistently seems as if you are trying to villainize Eric and sanctify Bill, even referring to Eric as the “bad boy” more than once in interviews. This certainly does not stay true to the spirit of the books, as Eric is absolutely not a villain or even a bad boy in the books, and likewise Bill is definitely not a saint, nor is he even a “good guy” half the time. Is there a reason that you try to portray these characters in this manner, and if so, what is it?
    —LISA ROWELL
     
     
    Hmm . . . I am not sure I agree with your assessment. We have purposely shown many darker aspects of Bill, such as his penchant for

Weitere Kostenlose Bücher