Modern Mind

217ff.
    37.
Ibid.,
pages 338–341.
    38. Jamieson and Eyerman,
Op. cit.,
page 36.
    39.
Ibid.,
page 37.
    40.
Ibid.,
pages 36–37.
    41.
Ibid.,
pages 33 and 34.
    42. C. Wright Mills,
The Power Elite,
New York: Oxford University Press, 1956, pages 274–275. See also: Howard S. Becker, ‘Professional sociology: The case of C. Wright Mills,’ in Roy C. Rist,
The Democratic Imagination: Dialogues on the work of Irving Louis Horowitz,
New Brunswick and London: Transaction, 1994, pages 157ff.
    43. Jamieson and Eyerman,
Op. cit.,
page 39.
    44.
Ibid.,
page 40.
    45. C. Wright Mills,
White Collar: The American Middle Classes,
New York: Oxford University Press, 1953, page ix, quoted in Jamieson and Eyerman, Op.
cit.,
page 40.
    46. C. Wright Mills,
White Collar, Op. cit.,
pages 294–295. Jamison and Eyerman, page 41.
    47. Jamison and Eyerman,
Op. cit.,
page 43.
    48.
Ibid.
    49. C. Wright Mills,
The Sociological Imagination,
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959, page 5.
    50.
Ibid.,
page 187.
    51. Jamieson and Eyerman, Op.
cit.,
page 46.
    52. J. K. Galbraith,
The Affluent Society,
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1958, Penguin paperback, 1991, page 40.
    53.
Ibid.,
page 65.
    54. In Galbraith’s first autobiography his debt to Keynes is clearly shown. See J. K. Galbraith,
A Life in Our Times,
London: André Deutsch, 1981, pages 74–82. See also page 622.
    55.
Ibid.,
page 86.
    56.
Ibid.,
pages 122ff.
    57.
Ibid.,
pages 128ff
    58.
Ibid.,
pages 182 and 191–195.
    59.
Ibid.,
pages 195ff.
    60.
Ibid.,
pages 233ff.
    61. In his autobiography, Galbraith says
Time
awarded it ‘a massive sneer’ but Malcolm Muggeridge put it into the same category as Tawney’s
The Acquisitive Society
and Keynes’s
The Economic Consequences of the Peace.
J. K. Galbraith,
A Life in Our Times, Op. cit.,
page 354.
    62. W W. Rostow,
The Stages of Economic Growth,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960, paperback edition, 1971.
    63.
Ibid.,
page 7.
    64.
Ibid.,
pages 36ff.
    65.
Ibid.,
pages 59ff.
    66.
Ibid.,
combining tables on pages 38 and 59.
    67.
Ibid.,
pages 73ff.
    68.
Ibid.,
page 11n.
    69.
Ibid.,
page 107.
    70. See the discussion by Fukuyama in the Conclusion
(infra).
    71. Rostow, Op.
cit.,
pages 102–103.
    72. Daniel Horowitz,
Vance Packard and American Social Criticism,
Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1994, pages 98–100.
    73.
Ibid.,
page 105.
    74.
Ibid.
    75. Vance Packard,
The Hidden Persuaders,
New York: David McKay, 1957.
    76.
Ibid.,
pages 87–88.
    77. Vance Packard,
The Status Seekers,
New York: David McKay, 1959.
    78. Horowitz, Op.
cit.,
page 123.
    79. Vance Packard,
The Waste Makers,
New York: David McKay, 1960.
    80. Horowitz, Op.
cit.,
page 119.
    81. Malcolm Waters,
Daniel Bell,
London: Routledge, 1996, pages 13–15.
    82. Waters, Op.
cit.,
page 78.
    83. Daniel Bell,
The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties,
Glencoe: The Free Press, 1960; 1965 paperback reprinted by Harvard University Press, 1988, with a new Afterword. Waters, Op.
cit.,
page 79.
    84. Waters, Op.
cit.,
page 80.
    85. See the chapters by Malcolm Dean, pages 105ff, and Daniel Bell, pages 123ff in Geoff Dench, Tony Flower and Kate Gavron (editors),
Young at Eighty,
London: Carcanet Press, 1995.
    86. Michael Young,
The Rise of the Meritocracy,
London: Thames & Hudson, 1958, republished with a new Introduction by the author, by Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1994.
    87.
Ibid.,
page xi.
    88.
Ibid.,
page xii. It was, however, poorly received by, among others, Richard Hoggart. See: Paul Barker, ‘The Up and Downs of the Meritocracy’, in Dench, Flower and Gavron (editors),
Op. cit.,
page 156.
    89. Young,
Op. cit.,
page 170.
    90. Barker,
Op. cit.,
page 161, cites reviewers who thought the book lacked ‘the sound of a human voice.’

CHAPTER 26: CRACKS IN THE CANON
    1.
Peter Ackroyd, T. S. Eliot, Op. cit., page 289.
    2. T. S. Eliot,
Notes Toward the Definition of Culture,
London: Faber & Faber, 1948, paperback 1962.
    3. Ackroyd,
Op. cit.,
page 291.
    4. For a discussion of Eliot’s wider thinking on leisure, see: Sencourt,
? S. Eliot: A Memoir, Op. cit.,
page 154.
    5. Eliot,
Notes, Op. cit.,
page 31.
    6.
Ibid.,
page 23.
    7.
Ibid.,
page 43.
    8. He was conscious himself, he said, of being a
European,
as opposed to a merely British, or American, figure. See: Sencourt,
Op. cit.,
page 158.
    9.
Eliot, Notes, Op. cit., page 50.
    10.
Ibid.,
pages 87ff.
    11.
Ibid.,
page 25.
    12. Ian