The German Genius

2005), p. 37.
67. Martinson, Companion , p. 43.
68. Ibid., p. 54.
69. Ibid., p. 77.
70. Ibid., p. 84.
71. Ibid., p. 207.
72. Ibid., p. 220.
    C HAPTER 5: N EW L IGHT ON THE S TRUCTURE OF THE M IND
     
1. Willibald Klinke, Kant for Everyman (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951), p. 43.
2. On Kant’s early opposition to Idealism, see Nova dilucidato , vol. 1, pp. 411–412. This may be found in Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften , which was edited by the Royal Prussian (later German) Academy of Sciences, Berlin, and published by George Reiner, subsequently Walter de Gruyter.
3. For Mendelssohn’s “philosophical preoccupations” see Alexander Altmann, Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study (London and Portland, Oregon: The Littman Library of Jewish Civilisation, 1998), pp. 313ff. Mendelssohn is more fully situated in the history of philosophy in Frederick C. Beiser, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987), pp. 92ff.
4. Klinke, Kant , p. 254.
5. Ibid., p. 202.
6. Lewis White Beck, Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1969), p. 327.
7. Altmann, Moses Mendelssohn . See also the same author’s Moses Mendelssohns Fruhschriften zur Metaphysik (Tübingen,: Mohr/Siebeck, 1969); and David Sorkin, Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment (London: Peter Halban, 1996), p. xl.
8. Karl Ameriks, ed., The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 1.
9. Ibid., p. 2.
10. Ibid.
11. Geschichte der Universität Jena, 1548/58–1958 (Jena: G. Fischer, 1958).
12. Ameriks, Cambridge Companion , p. 4.
13. Ibid.
14. Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2005), p. 640.
15. Klinke, Kant , p. 78.
16. Ibid., p. 81.
17. Ibid., p. 83. See also Andrew Ward, Kant: The Three Critiques (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2006).
18. Karl Ameriks, Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
19. Klinke, Kant , p. 87.
20. For the difficult idea of “ideality,” see Ameriks, Kant’s Theory , pp. 280ff, and Dieter Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism , ed. David S. Pacini (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003).
21. Klinke, Kant , p. 82.
22. Paul Guyer, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
23. Klinke, Kant , p. 91.
24. Ibid., p. 97.
25. Ibid., p. 114.
26. Ibid.
27. Falk Wunderlich, Kant und Bewusstseinstheorien des 18. Jahrhunderts (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005).
28. Klinke, Kant , p. 128.
29. Ernst Cassirer, Kant’s Life and Thought (New Haven, Conn., and London: Yale University Press, 1981), pp. 271–273.
30. Cassirer, Kant’s Life , p. 288.
31. Ibid., p. 303.
32. Ibid., p. 320.
33. Ibid., p. 323.
34. Manfred Frank, The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism , trans. Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004).
35. Cassirer, Kant’s Life , p. 333.
36. Pinkard, German Philosophy , p. 88.
37. Ibid., p. 89.
38. Henrich, op. cit ., pp. 96ff.
39. Pinkard, German Philosophy , p. 95.
40. Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel , p. 113ff and 127ff.
41. Pinkard, German Philosophy , p. 103.
42. Ibid., p. 105.
43. Russell, History , pp. 650–651. See also Robert Hanna, Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).
44. For the chronological emergence of Fichte’s ideas, see Walter E. Wright’s introduction to The Science of Knowing: J. G. Fichte’s 1804 Lectures on the Wissenschaftslehre , trans. Walter E. Wright (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2005).
45. Pinkard, German Philosophy , p. 106.
46. Dieter Henrich, “Die Anfänge der Theorie Subjekts,” in Zwischenbetrachtungen im Prozess der Aufklärung , ed. Axel Honneth et al. (Frankfurt: Surhkamp, 1989), pp. 106ff; also, in English, “Schulz and Post-Kantian Scepticism,” Chapter 10 of Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel. See also Beiser, Fate of Reason , pp. 226ff. (for Reinhold) and 266ff., for Schulze.
47. Fichte’s works were collected as J. G. Fichtes sämmtliche Werke , edited by J. H. Fichte in 1845–46, and published by Veit of Berlin.
48. Pinkard, German Philosophy , p.109.
49. Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel , pp. 206ff., also discusses Fichte’s theory of imagination, which, he says, is central.
50. Pinkard, German Philosophy , p. 123.
51.